Publications

Refine results

Search

Content Types

Compendium Consultations Current Consultations Press– Announcements– Other Meetings– Plenary Meetings– Press Releases– Speeches– Statements– Video and Audio Publications– Evaluations– Peer Review Reports– Policy Documents– Progress Reports– Reports to the G20 Responses to Consultations

Policy Areas

Accounting and Audit Quality Climate-related Risks Compensation Correspondent Banking COVID-19 CRAs Cross Border Payments Crypto Assets Cyber Resilience Data Gaps Deposit Insurance Disclosure Effects of Reforms EMDEs Financial Innovation Financial Regulation and Supervision fintech Governance Impact Assessments Implementation Monitoring Information Exchange Institutional and Market Infrastructure LEI LIBOR and other benchmarks Long-term Investment Finance Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency Macroprudential Members Non-bank financial intermediation OTC Derivatives Other Peer Reviews Regulatory Reform Recommendations Resolution and Crisis Management Securities Financing Transactions SIFIs Supervision and Risk Management Vulnerabilities Assessments

Sources

BCBS BIS CGFS Commonwealth Secretariat CPMI EC ECB EDTF Eurostat FASB FATF FSB FSF G20 IAASB IADI IAIS IASB ICCR IFIAR IFSB IMF IOPS IOSCO ISSB JF NGFS OECD Paris Club PIOB RCGs SSG TCFD UNCTAD WB

Published After

Published Before

204 results

Guidance on Identification of Critical Functions and Critical Shared Services

15 July 2013

This guidance should assist authorities and CMGs in their evaluation of the criticality of functions that firms provide to the real economy and financial markets.

Guidance on Developing Effective Resolution Strategies

15 July 2013

This guidance aims to assist authorities and firms in implementing the recovery and resolution planning requirements under the Key Attributes. The guidance was revised in light of comments received during the public consultation.

Implementing the FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes – how far have we come?

19 April 2013

At their February meeting this year, the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors reiterated their commitment to ensure that all global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFIs) are resolvable, and requested a report on progress. Authorities have made continued efforts to develop resolution strategies and operational plans for all G-SIFIs and to introduce resolution powers […]

FSB Data Gaps Initiative on a Common Data Template for G-SIBs – Phase 1

18 April 2013

The FSB announces the successful implementation of Phase 1 of the harmonised collection and pooling of improved consolidated data on bilateral counterparty credit exposures of major systemic banks.

Thematic Review on Resolution Regimes

11 April 2013

The thematic peer review report evaluates FSB jurisdictions’ existing resolution regimes and planned changes to those regimes using the FSB Key Attributes for Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions as a benchmark, and makes recommendations to support its timely and consistent implementation.

2012 Update of Group of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)

1 November 2012

The group of G-SIFIs is to be updated annually based on new data and published by the FSB each November.

The Financial Crisis and Information Gaps – Third Implementation Progress Report

30 September 2012

This paper reports on progress being made at the international and national levels in implementing the DGI recommendations and developing analytical work on new statistical frameworks.

Extending the G-SIFI Framework to domestic systemically important banks

20 April 2012

Extending the G-SIFI Framework to Domestic Systemically Important Banks

20 April 2012

This report describes progress made to extend the SIFI framework to banks that are systemically important in a domestic context (D-SIBs)

Public responses to October 2011 consultative document Common Template for Global Systemically Important Banks

19 March 2012

28 responses to the Consultation paper were received – 11 from national and international industry associations, 14 from individual financial institutions, and 3 from other firms and private individuals. Only the comments from national and international industry associations are published here.