FSB press briefing: Chair’s opening statement
25 June 2019
25 June 2019
24 June 2019
17 June 2019 | PDF full text (1 MB)
This progress report assesses the implementation of the FSB’s Principles and Standards for sound compensation practices (P&S) and how compensation practices have evolved since 2009.
The report finds that FSB jurisdictions have implemented the P&S for sound compensation for all banks considered significant for the purposes of the P&S. While most banks have put in place practices and procedures which reduce the potential for inappropriate risk-taking, their effectiveness is still being tested. At most banks, further work is required to validate that practices and procedures operate effectively and cover all compensation related risks. International supervisory dialogue has facilitated increased attention to compensation design and implementation, contributing to better practice. Authorities remain focused on compensation practices, with many now incorporating assessment of compensation practice as part of ongoing supervisory review processes. The report highlights that for significant banks a number of changes have taken place:
Boards appear more active and engaged and compensation processes are now conducted with greater oversight.
Compensation arrangements now have longer time horizons, include mechanisms that better align them with effective risk management practices and include a wider range of financial and non-financial risk assessment criteria.
In recent years, there has been an increased focus on compensation as a tool to address conduct risk and there is now greater emphasis on how results are achieved.
The next challenge is developing frameworks for assessing the effectiveness of compensation policies and practices in balancing risk and reward. Compensation systems should be monitored and reviewed to ensure that they operate as intended.
The P&S are intended to apply to financial institutions that are significant for the purposes of compensation standards including banks, insurers and asset managers. In most jurisdictions, identified institutions are mainly in the banking sector. Fewer jurisdictions have implemented the requirements for the insurance and asset management sectors.
As supervisors continue to monitor compensation practices at financial institutions that are significant for the purpose of the P&S, they will need to ensure that compensation remains aligned with prudent risk taking, and fully reflects evolving risks and new areas of vulnerabilities as they emerge.
Press enquiries:
+41 61 280 8138
[email protected]
Ref no: 26/2019
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) today published a progress report on the implementation of its Principles and Standards for sound compensation practices in financial institutions. The report assesses how compensation practices have evolved since the Principles and Standards were published in 2009.
The report confirms the finding of the previous progress report in June 2017 that all FSB jurisdictions have implemented the Principles and Standards for sound compensation for all banks considered significant for the purposes of the Principles and Standards. While most banks have put in place practices and procedures which reduce the potential for inappropriate risk-taking, their effectiveness is still being tested. At most banks, further work is required to validate that practices and procedures operate effectively and cover all compensation-related risks. International supervisory dialogue has facilitated increased attention to compensation design and implementation, contributing to better practice. Authorities remain focused on compensation practices, with many now incorporating assessment of compensation practice as part of ongoing supervisory review processes. The report highlights that for significant banks a number of changes have taken place:
Boards appear more active and engaged and compensation processes are now conducted with greater oversight.
Compensation arrangements now have longer time horizons, include mechanisms that better align them with effective risk management practices and include a wider range of financial and non-financial risk assessment criteria.
In recent years, there has been an increased focus on compensation as a tool to address conduct risk and there is now greater emphasis on how results are achieved.
The challenge now is developing frameworks for assessing the effectiveness of compensation policies and practices in balancing risk and reward. Compensation systems should be monitored and reviewed to ensure that they operate as intended.
The Principles and Standards are intended to apply to financial institutions that are significant for the purposes of compensation standards, including banks, insurers and asset managers. In most jurisdictions, identified institutions are mainly in the banking sector. Fewer jurisdictions have implemented the requirements for the insurance and asset management sectors.
As supervisors continue to monitor compensation practices, they will need to ensure that compensation remains aligned with prudent risk-taking, and fully reflects evolving risks and new areas of vulnerabilities as they emerge.
The Principles for Sound Compensation Practices and the Implementation Standards for the FSB Principles for Sound Compensation Practices were published in 2009. This is the FSB’s sixth progress report on the implementation of the Principles and Standards; the fifth progress report was published on 4 July 2017. In 2018 the FSB published Supplementary Guidance to the FSB Principles and Standards on Sound Compensation Practices and Recommendations for national supervisors: Reporting on the use of compensation tools to address potential misconduct risk as part of its 2015 workplan on measures to reduce misconduct risk.
The FSB coordinates at the international level the work of national financial authorities and international standard-setting bodies and develops and promotes the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory, and other financial sector policies in the interest of financial stability. It brings together national authorities responsible for financial stability in 24 countries and jurisdictions, international financial institutions, sector-specific international groupings of regulators and supervisors, and committees of central bank experts. The FSB also conducts outreach with approximately 70 other jurisdictions through its six Regional Consultative Groups.
The FSB is chaired by Randal K. Quarles, Vice Chairman for Supervision, US Federal Reserve; its Vice Chair is Klaas Knot, President, De Nederlandsche Bank. The FSB Secretariat is located in Basel, Switzerland, and hosted by the Bank for International Settlements.
14 June 2019
Press enquiries:
+41 61 280 8138
[email protected]
Ref no: 25/2019
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) Regional Consultative Group (RCG) for Asia met in Kuala Lumpur today at a meeting hosted by Bank Negara Malaysia.
Members of the FSB RCG for Asia considered vulnerabilities and regional financial stability issues. Meeting participants discussed risks from global trends, including the resumption of upward prices in risky assets, a loosening of credit standards and increases in the cost of credit. At the same time, they noted that resilience in the global financial system appears to have increased, financial markets are functioning robustly and financial conditions in emerging markets have stabilised. In spite of these positive trends, they agreed that efforts must continue to minimise the probability of another financial crisis, particularly given the increasing level of interconnectedness in the global financial system.
The group received an update on the FSB’s work programme, and in particular on market fragmentation, financial innovation and FinTech credit, as well as cyber incident response and recovery. Discussions on market fragmentation centred around the FSB’s recently published report on the subject and instances where reducing market fragmentation might have a positive impact on financial stability, or improve market efficiency without any detrimental effect on financial stability.
Members discussed the design and use of financial sector crisis simulation exercises. Members noted that such exercises could help to assess how well the crisis management framework works and scope for improvements. Challenges in their design, including cross-border aspects, were also considered. Members were briefed on lessons learnt from simulation exercises in Hong Kong SAR and Singapore, and exchanged views on how a regional exercise could be conducted.
RCG members discussed the growth of non-bank financial intermediation in the region. They noted that a significant portion of the growth is the result of an increase in intermediation by “other financial intermediaries” such as investment funds, captive financial institutions and moneylenders, broker-dealers and money market funds. Against this backdrop, members considered the challenges associated with the oversight and monitoring of the sector given its size and interconnectedness.
Financing to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the impact of post-crisis reforms was also discussed. SMEs form the backbone of many Asian economies and account for a large share of value added and employment. Members exchanged views on the impact of the reforms on SME financing and in this context, observed that the FSB’s recently published consultation report does not identify material and persistent negative effects on SME financing in general, although there is some differentiation across jurisdictions. Members also discussed the benefits of FinTech credit for SME financing while at the same time noting the challenges that it poses for authorities and ensuring its positive impact on productivity.
Members also discussed the financial risks, both physical and transition, resulting from climate change. They exchanged views on the roles of financial institutions, central banks and supervisors and recommendations put forward by the Network for Greening the Financial System.1
The meeting included a discussion on ways to improve the effectiveness of the RCGs as part of the FSB’s broader effort to enhance engagement with stakeholders. The discussion will feed into the FSB’s ongoing work to consider ways in which jurisdictions that are not members of the FSB can more effectively contribute to and benefit from the FSB’s work.
The FSB RCG for Asia is co-chaired by Philip Lowe, Governor, Reserve Bank of Australia and Nor Shamsiah Yunus, Governor, Bank Negara Malaysia. Membership of the RCG Asia comprises financial authorities from Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong SAR, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam.
The FSB has six Regional Consultative Groups, established under the FSB Charter, to bring together financial authorities from FSB member and non-member countries to exchange views on vulnerabilities affecting financial systems and on initiatives to promote financial stability.2 Typically, each Regional Consultative Group meets twice each year.
The FSB coordinates at the international level the work of national financial authorities and international standard setting bodies and develops and promotes the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory and other financial sector policies in the interest of financial stability. It brings together national authorities responsible for financial stability in 24 countries and jurisdictions, international financial institutions, sector-specific international groupings of regulators and supervisors, and committees of central bank experts. The FSB also conducts outreach with approximately 70 other jurisdictions through its six Regional Consultative Groups.
The FSB is chaired by Randal K. Quarles, Vice Chairman for Supervision, US Federal Reserve; its Vice Chair is Klaas Knot, President, De Nederlandsche Bank. The FSB Secretariat is located in Basel, Switzerland, and hosted by the Bank for International Settlements.
12 June 2019
7 June 2019
Press enquiries:
+41 61 280 8138
[email protected]
Ref no: 24/2019
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) held the latest in a series of roundtables on External Audit (“the Roundtable”) in Toronto on 6-7 June, hosted by Canada’s Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), and chaired by Superintendent Jeremy Rudin. The objective of the Roundtable was to engage in constructive dialogue regarding ways to promote international financial stability by enhancing public confidence in auditors and the quality of audits, especially for systemically important financial institutions.
Roundtable participants comprised senior representatives from FSB members, including national prudential authorities, market regulators and audit oversight bodies, the International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR), the international auditing standard-setter and the six largest global audit networks (“the global networks”).
In the context of the Roundtable’s objective, the following areas were considered:
The recurrence, level and root causes of audit inspection findings identified by IFIAR members in their individual inspections of audit firms affiliated with the global networks;
Observations from initial audits of expected credit loss estimates under IFRS 9, including the audit work needed to assess the related governance and controls, management judgments and assumptions, and the resulting presentation and disclosures;
The global networks’ progress in preparing for the implementation of IFRS 17 and the related audits;
Support for IFIAR in promoting collaboration in regulatory activity to foster the effectiveness of audit oversight globally;
Effective avenues to strengthen the dialogue between the official sector and the global networks, as a means to inform strong financial sector policies to advance audit quality and promote international financial stability;
Characteristics of audit services, particularly for financial statement audits of systemically important financial institutions, and the potential implications for the role of financial reporting in international financial stability; and
The importance of a robust and proactive approach by the global networks in continuing to improve audit quality.
The Roundtable’s chair will report the outcomes of the Roundtable to the FSB’s Standing Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Cooperation.
The FSB coordinates at the international level the work of national financial authorities and international standard-setting bodies and develops and promotes the implementation of effective regulatory, supervisory, and other financial sector policies in the interest of financial stability. It brings together national authorities responsible for financial stability in 24 countries and jurisdictions, international financial institutions, sector-specific international groupings of regulators and supervisors, and committees of central bank experts. The FSB also conducts outreach with approximately 70 other jurisdictions through its six Regional Consultative Groups.
Since 2012, the FSB has regularly held roundtables with key parties involved in advancing audit quality, including representatives of the global audit networks and IFIAR.
The FSB is chaired by Randal K. Quarles, Vice Chairman for Supervision, US Federal Reserve; its Vice Chair is Klaas Knot, President, De Nederlandsche Bank. The FSB Secretariat is located in Basel, Switzerland, and hosted by the Bank for International Settlements.
IFIAR was established in 2006, with the mission to serve the public interest, including investors, by enhancing audit oversight globally. It comprises independent audit regulators from 55 jurisdictions. For further information on IFIAR, visit www.ifiar.org.
IFRS 9 is the international financial reporting standard that addresses the accounting for financial instruments. It was published in July 2014, and became effective on 1 January 2018. It introduces a new expected credit loss model for the recognition of credit impairment.
IFRS 17 is the international financial reporting standard that addresses the accounting for insurance contracts. It was published in May 2017. In November 2018, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) proposed to postpone its effective application date to 1 January 2022.
This public consultation on an evaluation of financing for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is part of a broader examination of the effects of the G20 regulatory reforms on financial intermediation. It was delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors for their meeting in Fukuoka on 8-9 June.
This evaluation examines the effects of the post-crisis financial regulatory reforms on the financing of SMEs. As part of a broader FSB examination of the effects of the G20 regulatory reforms on financial intermediation, it is motivated by the need to better understand the effects of the reforms on the financing of real economic activity and their contribution to the G20 objective of strong, sustainable, balanced and inclusive economic growth.
For the reforms that are within the scope of this evaluation, the analysis thus far does not identify material and persistent negative effects on SME financing in general, although there is some differentiation across jurisdictions. There is some evidence that the more stringent risk-based capital requirements under Basel III slowed the pace and in some jurisdictions tightened the conditions of SME lending at those banks that were least capitalised ex ante relative to other banks. These effects are not homogeneous across jurisdictions and they are generally found to be temporary. The evaluation also provides some evidence for a reallocation of bank lending towards more creditworthy firms after the introduction of reforms, but this effect is not specific to SMEs.
SME lending growth has resumed in recent years, although volumes remain below the pre-crisis level in some jurisdictions. Access to external finance for SMEs also appears to have improved, particularly in advanced economies. Stakeholder feedback suggests that SME financing trends are largely driven by factors other than financial regulation, such as public policies and macroeconomic conditions.
Any potential costs found in this evaluation, which appear limited and transitory, should be framed against the wider financial stability benefits of the G20 reforms estimated in ex ante impact assessments. These studies generally found significant net overall benefits in terms of reducing the likelihood and severity (lost output) of financial crisesThe final report will be published in November 2019.
Responses to this public consultation should be sent to [email protected] by Wednesday 7 August 2019. Respondents are encouraged to use this template to submit their response. All responses will be published on the FSB website unless respondents expressly request otherwise. The final report will be published in November 2019.