This report recommends a policy framework for addressing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs).
Reports to the G20
27 June 2010
The FSB Chair reports on progress on core areas of reform: strengthening bank capital and liquidity standards; reducing the moral hazard posed by SIFIs; improving OTC derivatives markets; and enhancing incentive structures and transparency.
This report seeks the endorsement of the G20 Leaders for the overall direction of work on the development of a policy framework for reducing the moral hazard risks posed by SIFIs.
27 June 2010
Since the Pittsburgh Summit, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and its members have continued to press ahead with the G20 program of financial reforms. As called for by the G20 Leaders in Pittsburgh, the FSB has continued to coordinate and monitor progress, “which will be essential to the full and consistent implementation of needed reforms”. […]
This report sets out a summary table of the progress to date, and the proposed action plans going forward, with timetables, in addressing the 20 G20 endorsed recommendations.
19 April 2010
This report describes the measures that have been taken and other progress made to implement the recommendations made by the G20 and the FSB for strengthening financial stability since the November 2009 meeting of G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors at St Andrews.
7 November 2009
This report describes the measures that have been taken and other progress made since the Pittsburgh Summit to implement the recommendations made by the G20 and the FSB for strengthening financial stability.
7 November 2009
Note for the G20 Ministers and Governors for their 6-7 November 2009 meeting on the appropriate considerations for the removal of extraordinary financial sector support measures.
The attached report and background paper respond to a request made by the G20 Leaders in April 2009 to develop guidance for national authorities to assess the systemic importance of financial institutions, markets and instruments. The report outlines conceptual and analytical approaches to the assessment of systemic importance and discusses a possible form for general […]
To inform the preparation of the paper, country authorities were surveyed on their experiences with identifying systemically important institutions, markets and instruments. Feedback on an initial draft questionnaire, coordinated by the IMF, FSB and BIS, was sought from counterparts at several central banks (see Attachment). The finalized questionnaire was subsequently sent out to the central […]