Responses to past consultations

Refine results

Search

Policy Areas

Accounting and Audit Quality Climate-related Risks Compensation Correspondent Banking COVID-19 CRAs Cross Border Payments Crypto Assets Cyber Resilience Data Gaps Deposit Insurance Disclosure Effects of Reforms EMDEs Financial Innovation Financial Regulation and Supervision fintech Governance Impact Assessments Implementation Monitoring Information Exchange Institutional and Market Infrastructure LEI LIBOR and other benchmarks Long-term Investment Finance Macroeconomic Policy and Data Transparency Macroprudential Members Non-bank financial intermediation OTC Derivatives Other Peer Reviews Regulatory Reform Recommendations Resolution and Crisis Management Securities Financing Transactions SIFIs Supervision and Risk Management Vulnerabilities Assessments

Published After

Published Before

93 results

Date: Newest firstDate: Oldest firstTitle: A-ZTitle: Z-A

Public responses to November 2013 consultative document Guidance on Supervisory Interaction with Financial Institutions on Risk Culture

7 February 2014

Public comments received from 28 entities on the consultative document “Guidance on Supervisory Interaction with Financial Institutions on Risk Culture”.

Public responses to August 2013 Proposed Regulatory Framework for Haircuts on Non-centrally Cleared Securities Financing Transactions

20 December 2013

Comments received from 23 entities on August 2013 consultative proposals on minimum standards for methodologies to calculate haircuts on non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions and a framework of numerical haircut floors.This will serve as an input to finalise policy recommendations.

Public responses to August 2013 consultative document Assessment Methodology for the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions

21 November 2013

Public comments received on the consultative document issued on 28 August 2013.

Public responses to August 2013 consultative document Application of the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes to Non-Bank Financial Institutions

25 October 2013

Public comments received on the consultative document on the application of the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes to non-bank financial institutions published on 12 August 2013.

Public responses to August 2013 consultative document Information Sharing for Resolution Purposes

25 October 2013

Feedback received from entities on the consultative document on Information sharing for resolution purposes published on 12 August 2013.

Public responses to July 2013 Principles for an Effective Risk Appetite Framework

11 October 2013

Public feedback received from 32 entities on the FSB’s consultative document Principles for an Effective Risk Appetite Framework published on 17 July 2013.

Public responses to November 2012 consultative documents Strengthening Oversight of Shadow Banking

28 January 2013

Public feedback received on the November 2012 Consultative Documents on Strengthening Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking, which provided an initial integrated set of policy recommendations to strengthen oversight and regulation of shadow banking.

Public responses to July 2011 consultative document Effective Resolution of Systemically Important Financial Institutions

18 December 2012

Public feedback received from 15 entities on FSB’s consultative document on Recovery and Resolution Planning published on 2 November 2012.

Public responses to April 2012 consultative document Interim Report on Securities Lending and Repos

6 May 2012

Public comments received on the interim report on securities lending and repos published in April 2012 . The feedback will serve as an input to FSB’s workstream on securities lending and repos.

Public responses to October 2011 consultative document Common Template for Global Systemically Important Banks

19 March 2012

28 responses to the Consultation paper were received – 11 from national and international industry associations, 14 from individual financial institutions, and 3 from other firms and private individuals. Only the comments from national and international industry associations are published here.