This consultative document aims to provide guidance on the assessment of a jurisdiction's compliance with the Key Attributes.
Publications
Assessment Methodology for Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions
28 August 2013
27 August 2013
This report examines topics that are relevant for financial stability and important for the US: systemic risk oversight arrangements; supervision and oversight of FMIs; and insurance supervision.
26 August 2013
This report focuses on remaining gaps and impediments to full implementation of the FSB Principles and Standards (P&S) and describes some of the key challenges and evolving practices in this area.
The EDTF provided a second progress report on the level and quality of implementation of the EDTF Principles and Recommendations.
Application of the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes to Non-Bank Financial Institutions
12 August 2013
This consultation document aims to assist implementation of the Key Attributes with respect to resolution regimes for non-bank financial institutions. Comments should be sent to [email protected] by 15 October 2013.
12 August 2013
This consultative document sets out principles for national legal gateways and confidentiality regimes to allow the sharing of non-public information. Comments should be sent to [email protected] by 15 October.
Invitations to the workshop will be extended to all G-SIBs identified in November 2012 as well as to national and international banking federations that responded to the earlier FSB consultation exercise.
The FSB identifies the first group of 9 global systemically important insurers (G-SIIs) and the policy measures that apply to them.
17 July 2013
This consultative document provides guidance on the key elements contained in an effective risk appetite framework. Comments should be sent to [email protected] by Monday 30 September 2013.
16 July 2013
This guidance focuses on two specific aspects of recovery plans: the design and nature of criteria triggering senior management consideration of recovery actions, and the severity of hypothetical stress scenarios and the design of stress scenarios more generally.